Journal Press India®

Investigating the Risk-return and Volatility of the Environment, Social and Governance Index and the Benchmark Indices

Vol 11 , Issue 1 , January - June 2024 | Pages: 104-126 | Research Paper  

 
Article has been added to the cart.View Cart (0)
https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.mudra.v11i1.1112406


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Sunita Nandwani, Junior Research Fellow, Department of Commerce, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India (nandwanisunita@gmail.com)
2. Gurudatta Japee, Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India (profgurudutta1@gmail.com)

This article examines the risk-return and conditional volatility of the NIFTY100ESG, NIFTY500, and NIFTY100 indexes. Daily closing values for all three indices from April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2023, were obtained from the National Stock Exchange website. Both symmetric and asymmetric Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH, TGARCH, EGARCH, PGARCH) models have been used to analyse intrinsic conditional volatility. The NIFTY100ESG Index’s daily compounded returns are not statistically different from those of the NIFTY500 and NIFTY100, but its annualised return is higher and it outperformed Nifty500 in Jensen’s alpha, Sharpe, and Treynor ratios. The GARCH (1,1) results show volatility clustering in three indexes; the NIFTY100ESG index has much higher volatility than the benchmarks; and the PGARCH model, which uses the student’s t distribution, better captures the asymmetric volatility of all three index return series. The statistics show that positive shocks affect conditional volatility more than negative shocks. 

Keywords

Capital Asset Pricing Model; Environmental Social Governance (ESG) Index; GARCH Family Models; Risk-return Analysis; Volatility

  1. AL-Najjar, D. M. (2016). Modelling and estimation of volatility using ARCH/GARCH models in Jordan’s stock market. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(1), 152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v8i1.9129
  2. Banumathy, K. & Azhagaiah, R. (2015). Modelling stock market volatility: Evidence from India. Managing Global Transitions, 13(1), 27–42.
  3. Bhunia, A. & Ganguly, S. (2020). An assessment of volatility and leverage effect before and during the period of Covid-19: A study of selected international stock markets. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 10(2), 113. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfsm.2020.110224
  4. Bildirici, M. & Ersin, Ö. Ö. (2014). Nonlinearity, volatility and fractional integration in daily oil prices. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting-XVII, 3, 109.
  5. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  6. Collison, D. J., Cobb, G., Power, D. M. & Stevenson, L. A. (2008). The financial performance of the FTSE4Good indices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 14–28. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/ csr.144
  7. Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. J. & Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(1), 83–106. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D
  8. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773
  9. Engle, R. F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  10. Goudarzi, H. (2010). Modeling and estimation of volatility in the Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 85–98.
  11. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic economitrics. In McGraw-Hill Companies.
  12. Hassan, E. (2012). The application of GARCH and EGARCH in modeling the volatility of daily stock returns during massive shocks: The empirical case of Egypt. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 96, 143-154.
  13. Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2325404
  14. Kumar, S., Bharat, M. K., Birau, R., Simion, M.-L., Abhishek, A. & Manohar, S. (2023). Quantifying long-term volatility for developed stock markets: An empirical case study using PGARCH model on Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Economics and Applied Informatics, 29(2), 61–68. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409338
  15. Mittal, A. K., Arora, D. D. & Goyal, N. (2012). Modeling the volatility of Indian stock market. Gitam Journal of Management, 10(1), 224–243.
  16. Naliniprava, T. (2011). Forecasting volatility of Indian stock market. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(9), 225–238.
  17. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
  18. Rath, C., Kurniasari, F. & Deo, M. (2020). CEO compensation and firm performance: The role of ESG transparency. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 4(2), 278. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v4i2.225
  19. Rudd, A. (1981). Social responsibility and portfolio performance. California Management Review, 23(4), 55–61. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/41164931
  20. Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: Investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1
  21. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, XIX(3), 425–442.
  22. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 39(1),   119–138. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303300
  23. Singh, S. & Tripathi, D. L. K. (2016). Modelling stock market return volatility: Evidence from India. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(13), 2222–2847.
  24. Sudha, S. (2015). Risk-return and volatility analysis of sustainability index in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6), 1329–1342. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9608-8
  25. The Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: connecting financial markets to a changing world. Who cares wins connecting financial markets to a changing world, 1–59. Retrieved from https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_ wins_global_compact_2004.pdf
  26. Torre, M., Mango, F., Cafaro, A. & Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG index affect stock return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12166387
  27. Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43, 63–75. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119196679.ch10
  28. Vadithala, U. K. & Tadoori, G. (2021). Market efficiency of ESG and traditional indices-pre and post COVID analysis of NSE indices. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com /sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807952
  29. Vasal, V. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility & shareholder returns - Evidence from the Indian capital market. Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 376-385.
  30. Verheyden, T., Eccles, R., Feiner, A. & Partners, A. (2016). ESG for all. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jacf.12174
  31. Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(5), 931–955. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6
Abstract Views: 3
PDF Views: 2

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.