Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

This study explored the comparative effectiveness and efficiency of automated versus manual methods of literature reviews among teaching professionals, LIS professionals, and research scholars. Applying a mixed-methods methodology, the survey questionnaire was blended with a more comprehensive literature review to examine the frequency of use and preferences, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and attitudes in the adoption of automation at the academic and research levels. In addition, 56 respondents offer insightful understanding regarding the perception and utilization of automation in professional groups. The study clearly shows remarkable differences in preference and practice and emphasizes how the role of technology is continuously changing in processes for literature reviews. Besides, it explains the problems and opportunities with automation incorporated into research and teaching workflows. This helps fuel the discussion on improving research practices and the rate of technological adoption in higher education and professional settings. This paper provides actionable advice for educators, researchers, and LIS professionals.

Keywords

Automated Literature Review; Manual Literature Review; Research Practices; Teaching Professionals; LIS Professionals; Automation in Academia

1. Brown, C. (2018). Engaging with the literature: The benefits of manual review methods. Journal of Academic Research, 85-99.
2. Carnevale F. A., M. J. (2019). Exploring the utility of automation in academic research: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Research.
3. Green, J. R. (2022). Limitations of automated literature review tools in academic research. Journal of Information Science and Technology, , 145-162.
4. Harris, D. (2019). The hybrid approach to literature reviews: Combining automated and manual methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 275-290.
5. Lee, S. (2020). Effective hybrid literature review strategies for academic research. Information Research, 101-118.
6. Martinez, L. (2017). Reflective practices in manual literature reviews. Qualitative Research Journal, 58-72.
7. Smith, A. (2020). The role of manual literature reviews in ensuring research quality. Educational Research Review, 100-112.
8. Smith, A. B. (2020). Manual vs. automated literature reviews: A comparative analysis. Educational Research Quarterly, 189-204.
9. Wilson, K. (2021). Challenges of keyword-based search algorithms in literature review automation. Research Methods Quarterly,, 299-315.