Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Purpose: This paper attempts to study on the Entrepreneurship model of Business Education. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research is based on the secondary data taken from several reports and websites. Findings: The main findings of the research is that a traditional way of discussion in the classroom with theoretical models and without cases of the real situations requires more time for tuning the managerial aspirants with the industrial dynamic equations and the few successful models of education on different philosophies to train students for employment to global market, to domestic market, and to the market that is new to the economic developments. Research Limitations: The study was based on secondary sources, major limitations of the study are that the statistical tools would have been implemented to reach the result, and primary data through structured questionnaire might have been obtained. Managerial Implications: This research may help the government and industry to design the education pattern which will be a win-win situation for students and the industry, and government overall. Originality/Value: This research is a unique research study on Entrepreneurship model of Business education

Keywords

Economic Growth, Business Education, Entrepreneurship

1. Ansari, Mahfooz A., Baumgartel, Howard, and Sullivan, Geroge (1982), The Personal Orientation – Organisational Climate Fit and Managerial Success, Human Relations, Sage Publicaitons, Vol.35, pp.1159-1177.
2. Calantone, Roger J., Cavusgil, S. Tamer, and Zhao, Yushan (2000), Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.31, No.6, p.515.
3. Christensen, Clayton M., Johnson, Mark W., and Rigby, Darrell K. (2002) Foundations for Growth: How to Identify and Build Disruptive New Businesses, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.43, No.3, p.22.
4. Cui, G. and Chowdhary, P. (2002), Marketplace Diversity and Cost-effective Marketing Strategies, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.19, No.1, pp.54-73.
5. Dayal, I. (2002), Developing Management Education in India, Journal of Management Research, Vol.2, No.2, (Aug.), p.101.
6. Dyker, David (1997), The Technology of Transition, Budapest: CEU Press.
7. Hamel, Gary and Getz, Gary (2004), Funding Growth in an Age of Austerity, HBR On Point, USA, (July).
8. Knight, J. and DeWit, H. (1997), Internationalization of Higher Education in Asian Pacific Countries, European Association of International Education, Amsterdom, Netherlands.
9. Kretovics, M. (1999), Assessing the MBA: What do our Students Learn? Journal of Management Development, Vol.18, No.2, pp.125-136.
10. Natarajan, R. (2000), “University-Industry Cooperation, Collaboration and Partnership”, Presented at the Presidents of World Prestigious Universities Forum on the Theme, “Higher Education and Development of High-tech in the 21st Century – University and Enterprises”, Beijing-China.
11. Sustainable Economic Society of Switzerland, Newsletter (2004) (Feb.), No.2.
12. US Census Bureau (2008): BCG Analysis: URL: http://www.assocham.org/bpo/pres/casestudy-bcg.pdf
13. WDI (2006), GER data from UNESCO Institute for Statistic, Labour data (by skill distribution) from LABORSTA Database, International Labour Organisation (ILO), http://laborsta.ilo.org, Labour Share in Economic Sectors data from WDI (2006), Data on Labour Share in Economic Sectors on India from Table 5, URL: http://72.14.235.132/search?q=cache:JyZFqjgwtF8J:siteresources.worldbank.org/INTABCDE2007BEI/Resources/PAgarwal.PDF+WDI+2006+GER+data+from+UNESCO+INSTITUTE+for+Statistic,+Labour+data+(by+skill+distribution)+from+LABORSTA+Database,+ILO&hl= en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=in
14. Beracs, J., Bauer, A., Kenesei, Zs., and Kolos, K. (2002), Marketing and Competitiveness in a Changing World in Hungary”, Transition, Competitiveness and Economic Growth, Managing Business in Hungary, An international Perspective, Akademia Kiado, Budapest, Vol. 4, pp.197-226.
15. Buss, Terry F. (2000), “Economic Development in Hungary: The Transition Years – 1989 to 1998”, International Journal of Economic Development, Vol.2, No.1), pp.12-34.
16. Drucker, Peter F. (2002), “The Discipline of Innovation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.80, No.8, p.95-104.
17. Piatkowski, Marcin (2003), ‘Does ICT Investment Mater for Growth and Labour Productivity in Transition Economies?’ Tiger Working Paper Series, No. 47.
18. Porter, Michael E. and Scott, Stern (2001), “Innovation: Location Matters”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.42, No.4, pp.28-36.
19. Radosevic, Slavo (2002), “Innovation in Candidate Countries: Overview of Main Issues”, Presentation, Prague (June). Robert, L. Belknap and Kuhns, Richard (1979), Tradition and Innovation: General Education and the Reintegration of the University, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol.50, No.1 (Jan. - Feb.), pp.97-98.
20. Singh, Rahul and Chaturvedi, H. (2007), Industry Academia Partnership: A Review and Model for Indian Academia, Theme Paper of National Conference of Confederation of Indian Industry, (9 March), New Delhi, India.
21. Slaughter, John B. (1985), Innovation and Tradition in Higher Education, Publication of Education Resources Information Centre, USA.