Journal Press India®

DELHI BUSINESS REVIEW
Vol 7 , Issue 1 , January - June 2006 | Pages: 39-45 | Research Paper

Business, Government, and Education

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Om Prakash, Professor & Former Vice-Chancellor, National Fellow & Emeritus Fellow, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Purpose: This paper is seeks to examine, three sets of emerging relationships in India and some other countries, during the LPG era i.e. 1. Education and Government; 2. Government and Business; and 3. Business and Education Design/Methodology/Approach: The research is based on the secondary data taken from several reports and websites. World Development Report was also utilized to get the relevant information. Findings: Public expenditure as a proportion of GNP was highest in Sweden, both in 1980 (9.0%) and in 1997 (8.3%). India registered a marginal improvement from 3.0% (1980) to 3.2 (1997). The UK suffered marginally, the USA by a substantial margin, and Japan to a staggering extent, while France fairly improved her position. The Russian Federation remained static at 3.5%, while China witnessed a marginal decline from 2.5% (1980) to 2.3% (1997). Yet, the Adult Literacy Rate of China for the year 2002 was remarkably higher at 91% as against Indiaís 61%. In certain countries like the USA and the Netherlands, University-level education had moved on the road to counterproductivity in the matter of income level. The Government of India had collected about three thousand crore Rupees retrospectively with effect from April 2004 (Upto October 2004), but not a single paisa had been spent out of this earmarked fund during this period. This, along with a widened Service Tax of two percent, also levied retrospectively, was adding fuel to the fire of inflation. Research Limitations: Some statistical tools would have been implemented to reach the result, and primary data through structured questionnaire might have been obtained. Managerial Implications: This research may help the government and industry to design the education pattern which will be a win-win situation for students and the industry, and government overall. Originality/Value: This research is a unique research study.

Keywords

Government, Education, Industry, Business.

  1. Farkas, Charles, Backer, Philippe De and Sheppard, Allen (with Michael Craig-Copper also identified amongst authors of this work) (1997), “Maximum Leadership 2000 – The World’s Top Business Leaders Discuss How They Add Value to Their Companies”, Orient Business Books, London (Introduction).
  2. McCormack, Mark H. (1990), “What they don’t Teach you at Harvard Business School – Notes from A Street-Smart Executives”, (Preface).
  3. World Development Report 2000/2001, “Attacking Poverty”, Table 6 (Education), Published for the World Bank by Oxford University Press.
  4. The Times of India (2004), New Delhi, Friday, December 10.
  5. Tinbergen, Jan (1975), “Income Distribution – Analysis and Policies”, North Hlland Publishing Company, Amstardam, p.102 (and other connected material).
  6. World Development Report (2005), “A Better Investment Climate for Everyone”, Table 1 (Key Indiacators of Development), A Co-Publication of The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
  7. World Development Report (2004), “Making Services Work for Poor People”, Spotlight on Kerala and Uttar Pradesh (one nation, worlds apart), A Copublication of The World Bank and Oxford University Press, p.44.
Abstract Views: 1
PDF Views: 13

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.