Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine important work on MOOCs by researchers in the form of major contributing universities, sources of funding, authors, journals, keywords, and citation data. Design/Methodology/Approach: In this study, the researchers assessed by conducting a systematic review of MOOC literature, as other researchers have rightly said that reviewing entails learning from experience. In this study, patterns of research publications within particular topics and historical periods were described using bibliometric analysis, quantitative analysis, and statistical analysis. Findings: The results of this study’s cluster analysis revealed the areas where future academics might focus their efforts on MOOCs for future research. There were a total of 199 entries in the notifications, which were then sorted into seven clusters. Every cluster contains different numbers of items. According to the study’s findings, education, e-learning, online learning, massive open online courses, and data mining are the most often used keywords. Mostly, Social sciences and computer sciences articles have the highest contribution to research. Research Limitation: The current study only makes use of the Scopus database. The study’s focus was taken into consideration when selecting the keywords. Only three keywords were used in this study. The sole language employed in this study was English. Managerial Implications: Tthe paper would help the policymakers Future studies can analyse actual challenges faced by higher education institutions and suggest methods for incorporating MOOCs into the teaching environment to address them. In-depth reporting on real-world case studies can be helpful to academics as well as practitioners. Originality/Value: The evaluation of selected papers yielded a major contribution and food for thought for both scholars and policymakers.

Keywords

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), MOOC, Bibliometric Analysis, Systematic literature Review (SLR).

1. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010.


2. Alhazzani, N. (2020). MOOC’s impact on higher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100030.


3. Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Under- standing the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006.


4. Booth, A. (2016). Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A structured metho- dological review. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 74. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x.


5. Dhamija, P., & Bag, S. (2020). Role of artificial intelligence in operations environment: A review and bibliometric analysis. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 869-896. https:// doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0243.


6. Downes, S. (2008). Places to Go: Connectivism & Connective Knowledge. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(1), 1-8.


7. Germain, M.-L. (2019). Integrating Service-Learning and Consulting in Distance Education. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787694095.


8. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instruc- tors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001.


9. King, M., Luan, B., & Lopes, E. (2018). Experiences of Timorese language teachers in a blended Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Open Praxis, 10(3), 279. https:// doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.3.840.


10. Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014-Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693.


11. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202. https:// doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455.


12. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). A bibliometricanalysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004.


13. Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Munoz- Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2019). Prediction in MOOCs: A Review and Future Research Directions. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2856808.


14. Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2(1), 902. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902.


15. Tatham, P., Spens, K., & Kovács, G. (2017). The humanitarian common logistic operating picture: a solution to the inter-agency coordination challenge. Disasters, 41(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12193.


16. Tony Cripps. (2014). It’s my challenge”: Exploring the MOOC terrain. https://fass.nus.edu.sg/cls/wp-content/ uploads/sites/32/2020/10/cripps_tony-1.pdf.


17. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). https://doi.org/ 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202.


18. Wahid, R., Ahmi, A., & Alam, A. S. . F. (2020). Growth and Collaboration in Massive Open Online Courses: A Bibliometric Analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 292-322. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4693.


19. Zheng, Y., & Yang, R.-Y. (2017). The Rise of MOOCs: The Literature Review of Research Progress and Hot Spots of MOOCs Education in Mainland China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.12973/ eurasia.2017.01056a.


20. Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.iheduc.2018.01.002.




 
21.  
22.