Journal Press India®

Rules Written in Blood: A Case Study of Risk Management in the Oil and Gas Industry

Vol 24 , Issue 1 , January - June 2023 | Pages: 1-16 | Research Paper  

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v24i1.241202301


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. Seth Osborne, Researcher, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
2. Anthony Sarnoski, Researcher, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
3. Stephen Wathen, Researcher, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
4. Robert Hutchins, Researcher, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
5. Zachariah DeBacker, Researcher, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
6. Andy Bertsch, Professor, Minot State University, North Dakota, USA
7. * Mohammad Saeed, Professor Emeritus, Minot State University, North Dakota, USA (m.saeed@minotstateu.edu)

Purpose: The study aims to investigate how and when the oil and gas industry adopts industry best practices and enhanced standards addressing process safety and operational integrity after catastrophic events. Design/Methodology/Approach: We reviewed the literature available for disastrous incidents that shaped the oil and gas industry with a special reference to three distinct catastrophic events: Piper Alpha (1988), Deepwater Horizon (2010) and Ku-Maloob-Zapp (KUMAZA) (2021). Three primary case studies were evaluated to understand the cycle of creation and adoption of industrial standards meant to address risk management related to process safety and operational integrity in the industry. Findings: We have proposed an adoption cycle for how the industry reacts to catastrophic events, with respect to the adoption of best practices, and creation of enhanced standards, to address the root causes of these events. System 1 thinking dominated initial reactions to each catastrophic event, through the integration of existing standards. System 2 thinking drives the formulation of enhanced standards which more thoroughly deal with additional factors which contributed to compelling events. Research Limitation: Future research may explore the nuances related to the timeline for adoption of industry best practices once a standard is published by API, ISO, or another SME. These nuances could include different organizational profiles for companies adopting a standard. Managerial Implications: This study offered insights intorisk manage- ment as applied to process safety in oil and gas operations. There exists a lag between the creation of industry best practices through the publication of standards, and the adoption of these practices. Originality/Value: Future researchers may research and generalize findings beyond the current parameters of this study.

Keywords

Operational Integrity, Process Safety, Quality Systems, Risk Management, Risk Mitigation, Safety Standards.


  1. Acheampong, T., Phimister, E., & Kemp, A. (2021). What difference has the Cullen Report made? Empirical analysis of offshore safety regulations in the United Kingdom’s oil and gas industry. Energy Policy, 155, 112354. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112354.

  2. API. (2001). Recommended Practice for Design and Hazards Analysis for Offshore Production Facilities,

  3. Second Edition. American Petroleum Institute. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/reports/exhibit- 12.pdf.

  4. API. (2004). Recommended Practice 75: Fourth Edition. American Petroleum Institute. https://www.api.org/ products-and-services/standards/important-standards- announcements/recommended-practice-75.

  5. API. (2020). API Standards: International Uses And Deployment. https://www.api.org/products-and-services/ standards/important-standards-announcements/ internationalusagedeployment#:~:text=The API Standards%3A International Usage,health%2C safety%2C and sustainability.

  6. APIQR. (2021). APIQR Registration Program Requirements. https://www.api.org/-/media/files/ certification/monogram-apiqr/0_api-monogram-apiqr/ resources/api_apiqr_program_registration_require ments_fm-004_revision_13_20210907.pdf?la=en&hash=F7C62249B7DB86928587A2B61055EBF78E0B2E85.

  7. ASQ. (2021a). ISO 9001:2015: Quality Management Systems - Requirements. https://asq.org/quality-press/ display-item?item=T1040.

  8. ASQ. (2021b). What Is The ISO 9000 Standards Series? Retrieved from ASQ: Quality Resources. https://asq.org/ quality-resources/iso-9000.

  9. Barrera, A., & Parraga, M. (2021). Eye of fire’ in Mexican waters snuffed out, says national oil company. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/fire-offshore- pemex-platform-gulf-mexico-under-control-2021-07-02/.

  10. Bennett, C. T. (1995). Risk management & organizational uncertainty implications for the assessment of high consequence organizations. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/ 61736.

  11. BOEM. (2011). Report Regarding The Causes Of The April 20, 2010 Macondo Well Blowou. https://www.bsee. gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/reports/safety/dwhfinal.pdf.

  12. BP. (2010). Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/businesssites/ en/global/corporate/pdfs/sustainability/issue-briefings/ deepwater-horizon-accident-investigation-report.pdf.

  13. Bryden, R., Chandler, E., Kulawski, G., & LeBlanc, C. (2018, April 16). Process Safety Behaviour Change: Improving Operational Integrity Through Process Safety Fundamentals. Day 3 Wed, April 18, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.2118/190590-MS.

  14. Cullen, T. H. L. (1990). The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster (Vol. 2). Department of Energy. https:// www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/piper-alpha-public-inquiry- volume2.pdf.

  15. D J Pratt. (1995). British Standard (BS) 5750 – Quality Assurance? Digital Resource Foundation. https:// www.oandplibrary.org/poi/1995_01_031.asp.

  16. Deepwater Horizon. (2010). Deepwater Horizon oil spill https://www.britannica.com/event/Deepwater-Horizon-oil- spill.

  17. George Baker. (2011). The Political Science Of Industrial Safety Have The Deeper Lessons Of “Deepwater Horizon” Been Learned. The Journal of Energy and Development, 36.

  18. Hansard. (1980). Offshore Safety. https://api.parliament. uk/historichansard/commons/1980/nov/06/offshore-safety.

  19. IOGP. (2021). Safety performance indicators – 2020 data. The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. https://www.iogp.org/bookstore/product/safety-perfor mance-indicators-2020-data/.

  20. Kahneman, D. (2012). Of 2 Minds: How Fast and Slow Thinking Shape Perception and Choice. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ kahneman-excerpt-thinking-fast-and-slow/.

  21. Macleod, Fiona (2018). Piper Alpha: The Disaster in Detail. Piper Alpha Perspectives. https://www.thechemical engineer.com/features/piper-alpha-the-disaster-in-detail/ #:~:text=The remains of Piper Alpha,30 bodies were never recovered.

  22. Martinez, A. I. (2021). Five killed in Mexico’s oil platform fire, hammering Mexico output. Reuters. https://www. reuters.com/business/energy/one-dead-five-missing-after- pemex-offshore-platform-fire-2021-08-23/.

  23. McLeod, R. W. (2016, April 11). Styles of Thinking, Beha- vioural Economics and Operational Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Activities. Day 1 Mon, April 11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2118/179197-MS.

  24. National Commission. (2011). Deep Water: The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling. https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-OILCOMMISSION/ pdf/GPO-OILCOMMISSION.pdf.

  25. OECD. (2017). Public Procurement Review of Mexico’s PEMEX Adapting to Change in the Oil Industry. https:// www.oecd.org/governance/public-procurement-review-of- mexico-s-pemex-9789264268555-en.htm.

  26. Offshore Energy. (2013). Piper 25: Lord Cullen to Stress Importance of Strong Leadership in Offshore Safety. https://www.offshore-energy.biz/piper-25-lord-cullen-to-stress- importance-of-strong-leadership-in-offshore-safety/.

  27. Piper Alpha. (1988). Piper Alpha: The Disaster in Detail. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/piper- alpha-the-disaster-in-detail/.

  28. Preben Lindoe. (2013). Robust offshore risk regulation - An assessment of US, UK and Norwegian approaches. Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Techno- logies. https://www.academia.edu/26604842/Robust_ offshore_risk_regulation_an_assessment_of_US_UK_ and_Norwegian_approaches.

  29. Straessle, B. (2014). API fully implementing Spec Q2 certification for drilling service providers. American Petroleum Institute. https://www.api.org/news-policy-and-issues/news/2014/05/06/api-fully-implementing-spec-q2- certifica.

  30. Tabibzadeh, M., & Meshkati, N. (2014). Learning from the BP Deepwater Horizon accident: risk analysis of human and organizational factors in negative pressure test. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(2), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9497-2.

  31. The Maritime Executive. (2021). Pemex Restores Offshore Production After Fire Guts E-Ku-A2 Platform. https://maritime-executive.com/article/pemex-restores- production-after-fire-guts-e-ku-a2-platform.

  32. The National Archives. (1992). Offshore Safety Act 1992. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/15/section/1.

  33. Thom, A. A. (2011). Managing labour under extreme risk: collective bargaining in the North Sea Oil industry. Council of National Academic Awards. http://hdl.handle. net/10059/598.

  34. Whyte, D. (2018). Two neoliberal infernos: Grenfell, and Piper Alpha 30 years on. Open Democracy. https:// www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/30-years-on-from-piper-alpha-grenfell-shows-us-what-we-still- havent-learned/.

  35. Wilkinson, P. (2014). The role of “Active Monitoring” in Preventing Major Accidents. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. https://www.csb.gov/assets/1/7/ wilkinson_active_monitoring.pdf.

  36. Woolfson, C. (2013). Preventable Disasters in the Offshore Oil Industry: From Piper Alpha to Deepwater Horizon. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 22(4), 497-524. https:// doi.org/10.2190/NS.22.4.h.

  37. Woolfson, C., & Beck, M. (2000). The British Offshore Oil Industry after Piper Alpha. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 10(1-2), 11-65. https://doi.org/10.2190/TCMB-YQA4- TXU0-B1D4.

  38. Woolfson, C., & Beck, M. (2004). Union recognition in Britain’s offshore oil and gas industry: implications of the Employment Relations Act 1999. Industrial Relations Journal, 35(4), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 2338.2004.00318.x.



  39.  
  40.  
Abstract Views: 12
PDF Views: 440

Advanced Search

News/Events

Ramachandran Interna...

Ramachandran International Institute of Management (RIIM), Pune Org...

PCETs Pimpri Chinchw...

PCET's Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering and Research Org...

Institute of Managem...

Institute of Management Technology, Nagpur Organizing International...

GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

IIULM University, Milan, Italy Organizing GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

Dept. of MBA, Karnat...

Department of MBA, KLS, Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi Org...

Indira School of Bus...

Indira School of Mangement Studies PGDM, Pune Organizing Internatio...

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.