Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Purpose: The present empirical study attempted to analyze various factors and stakeholders of the Liluah metal casting cluster and its impact on local economic development. In addition, we explained the role of COVID-19 in this MSMEs cluster. Design/Methodology/Approach: To achieve the set of objectives, the research has used purposive sampling. The data were collected through structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews with firm owners. The primary data have been used and secondary data collected through various sources for the study. Findings: Liluah metal casting cluster plays a crucial role in the local economy in terms of employment and business prospect. The study also found that the manufacturing units and annual turnover increased in the last two decades, and the number of laborers decreased rapidly. Despite the huge scope of improvement in the market, technology, skill training, etc., the present cluster is suffering from a lack of capital, the latest technology, skilled workers, pollution, and competition with foreign products. Further, possibilities of innovation practices in the cluster can be achieved as far as the development of the cluster is concerned. Research Limitations: The study has several limitations. For instance, the study has analyzed the impact of the cluster on the local economic development based on the firm owners’ perspective and attempted to explain various challenges and prospects. Future, there is a need to integrate various stakeholders like laborers, government institutions, and intermediaries with other allied manufacturing sectors. The sample was selected only for the Howrah district’s Liluah metal casting cluster owners. Managerial Implications: Practically, it highlighted the challenges and prospects of the present cluster. Therefore, the study suggested that innovation practices can be led to positive growth of the cluster where research and development can play an important role. Originality/Value: The empirical study mainly focuses on the Liluah metal casting cluster of the Howrah district. The research paper is based on the Ph.D. thesis, and all the data and information mentioned here are original.

Keywords

Manufacturing Cluster; Metal Casting Cluster; Innovation; Inter firm Linkages; COVID-19.

1. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1


2. Best, M. H. (2011). The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring. In Wiley.


3. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.


4. Brenner, T., & Gildner, A. (2006). Long-term Implications of Local Industrial Clusters. European Planning Studies, 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600933371


5. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.


6. Cainelli, G., & Zoboli, R. (2004). The Evolution of Industrial Districts: Changing Governance, Innovation and Internationalisation of Local Capitalism in Italy. In Contributions to Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2700-2


7. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Pres.


8. Cooke, P. (1997). Regions in a global market: the experiences of Wales and Baden-Wurttemberg. Review of International Political Economy, 4(2), 349–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922997347814


9. Dalum, B., Pedersen, C. Ø. R., & Villumsen, G. (2005). Technological Life-Cycles: Lessons from a Cluster Facing Disruption. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776405056594


10. Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998). Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice? Management Learning, 29(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507698293001


11. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420


12. Grabher, G. (1993). The Weakness of Strong Ties; the Lock-In of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area. In The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.


13. Guerrieri, P., & Pietrobelli, C. (2004). Industrial districts’ evolution and technological regimes: Italy and Taiwan. Technovation, 24(11), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00048-8


14. Iammarino, S., & McCann, P. (2006). The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Research Policy, 35(7), 1018–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004


15. Jones, A. (1998). Local economies and business networks re‐visited. A case study of business and professional services in London. Local Economy, 13(2), 151–165.


16. Kasabov, E. (2010). Why Every Cluster Cannot be a Successful Community? European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1445–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.492586


17. Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007). Proximity, Knowledge and Innovation in Peripheral Regions. On the Intersection between Geographical and Organizational Proximity. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601133260


18. Langlois, R. N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1999). The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry 1947–1996. In Sources of industrial leadership : studies of seven industries (Issue Ferguson 1993, pp. 19–78). Cambridge Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175128


19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355


20. Lovering, J. (2001). The Coming Regional Crisis (And How to Avoid It). Regional Studies, 35(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400124009


21. Lovering, J. (2007). The Relationship Between Urban Regeneration and Neoliberalism: Two Presumptuous Theories and a Research Agenda. International Planning Studies, 12(4), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701745504


22. Macleod, G., & Jones, M. (2007). Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In What Sense a ‘Regional World’? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701646182


23. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2011). Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the Life Cycle Model? Regional Studies, 45(10), 1299–1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.622263


24. Menzel, M.-P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster Life Cycles – Dimensions and Rationales of Cluster Evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp036


25. Miles, R. E., & Scaringella, L. (2012). Designing Firms to Fit the Future. Journal of Organization Design, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.1.2.6343


26. Ministry of MSME, G. of I. (2017). District Industrial Profile. http://www.msmedikolkata.gov.in/uploads/2021/03/districtprofiles/2017-18/HOWRAH.pdf


27. Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We There Yet? Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413


28. Østergaard, C. R. (2008). Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: Comparing university and industry links. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2008.10.003


29. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.


30. Randelli, F., & Boschma, R. (2012). Dynamics of Industrial Districts and Business Groups: The Case of the Marche Region. European Planning Studies, 20(12), 1961–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.665040


31. Shaw, A. T., & Gilly, J.-P. (2000). On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050006087


32. Steven Klepper. (2010). The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.004


33. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The Construction of `Communities of Practice’ in the Management of Innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602334005


34. The Energy and Resources Institute, T. (2016). Annual Report, 2016/17. https://www.teriin.org/sites/default/files/files/TAR_2016-17.pdf


35. Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320842


36. Walker, R., & Storper, M. (1989). The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology and Industrial Growth (XI). New York: Basil Blackwell