Journal Press India®

DELHI BUSINESS REVIEW
Vol 20 , Issue 2 , July - December 2019 | Pages: 1-9 | Research Paper

Resistance Behavior of Cantrang Prohibition Analysis in Central Java-Indonesia

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Purwoko Tony, Lecturer, Master of Management Program, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan University, Yogyakarta, (Tony@uny.ac.id )
2. Wijaya Zunan, Associate Professor, Management Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta,
3. Setiawan Lecturer, Master of Management Program, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan University, Yogyakarta,

Purpose: The study aims to analyze several factors that influence the resistance behavior of cantrang bans in Central Java, Indonesia. The basic model is used to analyze using Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1985) by taking four variables or factors that influence the attitude of rejecting the prohibition, namely natural awareness, knowledge, emotions, and income. The attitude of rejecting to influence intention, and intention influences resistance behavior. Resistance behavior is also influenced by behavioral control or perceived risk.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This research adheres to the positivism paradigm. The population in this study were all fishermen in Pati District, Central Java who had used cantrang. Sample size of the study is 200 fishermen, which fulfilled the statistical testing requirements in the structural equation model. Purposive sampling method was used to collect information from the respondents about cantrang prohibition behavior. Data collection techniques are surveys using a structured questionnaire. Data analysis has been done using Structural Equation Modeling.

Finding: The results indicate that knowledge has negatively affected the attitudes of rejecting, emotions have a significant positive impact on rejecting attitudes, concern for nature has also a negative impact on attitude to reject, income has a significant positive effect on behavior rejecting, rejecting attitude has a significant positive effect on intention in rejecting, behavioral control has a positive impact on rejecting behavior, and intention in rejecting has a positive impact on the behavior of rejecting cantrang prohibitions.

Research Limitations: This study was limited to one district i.e. Pati, Central Java-Indonesia.

Practical Implications: This research will also contribute to government policies in planting values of marine ecosystem care.

Originality/Value: There has not been a similar study conducted in the study area.

Keywords

Awareness, Knowledge, Emotions and Income, Behavioral Control, Intention, Behavior, Cantrang.

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl and Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  2. Cornescu, V., & Adam, C. R. (2013). The consumer resistance behavior towards innovation. Science Direct, Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 457-465.
  3. Engel, J. F., Roger, D. B., & Paul, W. M. (1986). Consumer behavior. Chicago : Dryden Press.
  4. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to theory and research. U.S.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
  5. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey : Prentice Hall International, Inc.
  6. Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing management. New Jersey : Prentice Hall International, Inc.
  7. Marakas, G. M., & Hornik, S. (1996). Passive resistance misuse: Overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation. Europeon Journal of Information System, 5(3), 208-219.
  8. Ministry of Marine and Fisheries. (2015). Ministry of Marine and Fisheries regulation no. 2/Permen-Kp/2015 about prohibit for using Hela Trawl and Seine net at Area of Fisheries Management of  Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.committedtocrab.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2-permen-kp-2015.pdf, Accessed on March 10, 2019.
  9. Pejas, R. M., & Òska, S. (2011). The rationality of consumer behavior on the food products market. Delhi Business Review, 12(2), 11-19.
  10. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-795.
  11. Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208-212.
  12. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  13. Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.
  14. Wijaya, T., & Sukidjo. (2017). Organic knowledge as antecedent of purchase intention on organic food. International Journal of Business & Management Science, 7(2), 297-315.
  15. WWF. (2015). Trawel dan Cantrang, Keuntungan Yang Buntung. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.or.id›Trawl-dan-Cantrang-Keuntungan-yang-Buntung, Accessed on March 10, 2019.
Abstract Views: 27
PDF Views: 421

Related Articles
Consumer Shopping Behaviour among Modern Retail Formats
Mr. Hotniar Siringoringo, Mr. Anacostia Kowanda
Impact of Mobile Intervention in Indian Agriculture
Mr. Pooja Jain, Mr. J. K. Goyal
An Investigation into the Determinants of Investment Knowledge among Younger Generation with Reference to Undergraduate Students of Bhutan
Dr. Purna Prasad Sharma, Sonam Tobden, Sonam Wangdi, Tandin Wangchuk, Sonam Dorji, Sonam Yanzom
The Female Entrepreneurs’ Attitude Towards Entrepreneurship: How Entrepreneurial Orientation and Desirability Influence Intention of Entrepreneurial Students?
Prof. Thoudam Prabha Devi, Prof. Shrikant Krupasindhu Panigrahi, Prof. Chinglen Maisnam, Mr. Wafa Al Alyani, Mr. Ermal Bino

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.