Journal Press India^®

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

Purpose: The primary purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature and prevalence of Knowledge Technology in knowledge organizations and how Knowledge Technology varies across six knowledge organizations on sectoral lines and two genders of knowledge workers from the sample of 204 employees.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A questionnaire, containing basic demographic variables and Knowledge Technology items has been provided to respondents i.e., to workers and managers spread across various functional groups, managerial levels from six selected knowledge organizations operating in different sectors of the Indian economy. A total of 204 fully-filled questionnaires have been received both personally and through emails and digital forms. The collected data was statistically treated, using SPSS, with the technique of Principal Component Analysis to figure out the relative importance of items in the Knowledge Technology variable and its unitary nature. Multiple Regression Equation with dummy variables is used to decipher the distribution of Knowledge Technology across six Knowledge Organizations. The difference of perception regarding Knowledge Technology across both genders was assessed using Multiple Regression Equation with dummy variables.

Findings: Knowledge Technology is found out to be a unitary variable shown in one Principal Component encompassing 5 technological items having dimensions such as ability to cater to user idiosyncrasies, contextuality of available knowledge, and intimate connectivity between knowledge and user. The sectoral differences were found and it was evident that the organizations belonging to IT sector are far ahead in having Knowledge Technology in their organizations. No significant gender differences were found between the perception of male and female knowledge workers regarding their perception of Knowledge Technology in their respective organizations.

Research Limitations: This study was conducted in only six knowledge organizations located in India with a sample of 204 knowledge workers. Hence, its generalizability is limited to other similar contexts. The limitations of the questionnaire survey technique are also applicable.

Practical Implications: This paper points out that the Knowledge Technology is the unitary variable and the main focus of the Knowledge Technology should be on the accessibility of data, information, and network to individual user or knowledge worker per se. Even though the organizations operate in different sectors of the economy, efforts should be made such that all the other Indian organizations which are not operating in IT sector, can also benefit from proper deployment of the Knowledge Technology focussing on individual knowledge worker’s needs and requirements being fulfilled at the right time and at the right place for effective knowledge management.

Originality/Value: There are very few research studies which focus mainly on the technological dimension in the Indian organizations. This empirical research paper tries to fill this gap. This empirical study is all about the Knowledge Technology in Indian organizations and its distribution across gender and sectoral dimensions of the economy.

Keywords

Knowledge Technology, Knowledge Organization, Knowledge Worker, ICT, IT.

1. Bolisani, E., & Scarso, E. (1999). Information technology management: A knowledge-based perspective. Technovation, 19(4), 209-217.
2. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
3. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
4. Dieng, R., Corby, O., Giboin, A., & Ribiere, M. (1999). Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3), 567-598. 
5. Dutt, H. (2006). Role of knowledge manager in knowledge product development evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Delhi Business Review, 7(1), 59-70.
6. Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows, (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
7. Field, A., & Miles, J. (2010). Discovering Statistics Using SAS.  London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
8. Grover, D., & Banerjee, S. (2005). Building the business relationship through knowledge management. Delhi Business Review, 6(2),  69-74.
9. Guns, W. D., & Valikangas, L. (1997). Rethinking knowledge work: creating value through idiosyncratic knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(4), 287-293.
10. Kuhn, O., & Abecker, A. (1997). Corporate memories for knowledge management in industrial practice: prospects and challenges. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), 929-954.
11. Kumar, M. (2012). Knowledge management: A study of selected organizations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
12. Kumar, M. (2013). Effect of leadership behaviors on knowledge creation in Indian organizations. Delhi Business Review, 14(2), 57-82. 
13. Kumar, M. (2014). The relationship of knowledge identification and creation with leadership, culture and technology. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 7-37.
14. Liao, S. H. (2003). Knowledge management technologies and applications — literature review from 1995 to 2002. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(2), 155-164.
15. Merali, Y. (1997). Information, systems and dasei. In Stowell, F., McRobb, I., Landor, R., Ison, R., & Holoway, J. (Eds.), Systems for Sustainability: People, Organisations and Environments (pp. 595-600). New York: Plenum Press.
16. Merlyn, P. R., & Välikangas, L. (1998). From information technology to knowledge technology: taking the user into consideration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 28-35.
17. Milton, N., Shadbolt, N., Cottam, H., & Hammersley, M. (1999). Towards a knowledge technology for knowledge management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(3), 615-641.
18. Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2002). Managing knowledge work. New York: PALGRAVE.
19. Sharma, V. (2005). Knowledge Management- A HR tool to get competitive edge: An empirical study in telecom sector. Delhi Business Review, 6(2), 51-60.
20. Sharma, V. (2008). Knowledge management as a turnaround factor for organisational learning and employee satisfaction: An empirical study in pharmaceutical sector. Delhi Business Review, 9(2), 67-78.
21. Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & Management, 41(8), 933-945.
22. Shum, S. B. (1997). Negotiating the construction and reconstruction of organisational memories. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), 899-928.
23. Singh, A. K., & Kumar, M. (2013). Organizational leadership in India. In C.S. Sharma & R.K. Singh (Eds.), Transformational Leadership and Beyond (pp.53-67). New Delhi, India: Excel India Publishers.
24. Singh, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2008a). Key attributes of successful knowledge management: An empirical study in telecom 
25. and software sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Management-2008, (February 25-26, 2008) at IMT, Ghaziabad (pp. 495-502). Haryana, India: McMillan Publications. ISBN: 10: 0230-63469-9; ISBN: 13: 978-0230-63469-5.
26. Singh, A.K., & Sharma, V. (2008b). A study on implications of culture driven knowledge management on employee satisfaction in indian telecom sector. In Coskun Can Aktan and OzkanDalbay (Eds.), Management and Behaviour in Organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 15-28). Selected Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social Sciences, Organized by Social Sciences Research Society on August 21-22, 2008 at Izmir, Turkey. ISBN: 978-605-5741-16-3.
27. Singh, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2008c). Knowledge management and organisational learning: An empirical study of its implications on employee satisfaction in telecom sector. Proceedings of the National Conference on Management- 2007 on Corporate Strategies and Innovations in the Emerging Global Economy (pp. 302-318) on November, 23-24, 2008 at GGS Indraprastha University, New Delhi. New Delhi: Wisdom Publications.
28. Singh, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2008d). Antecedents of knowledge management and its impact on employee satisfaction: A study on indian telecom sector. In B.S. Sahay, J. Ranjan, R. R. Thakur, & S. Nicholas (Eds.), Redefining Business Horizons. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation and Redefining Business (IIRB) -2008 (pp. 570-581) organized at IMT, Ghaziabad, India. Haryana, India: McMillan Publications.
29. Singh, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2011a). Key attributes of successful knowledge management: An empirical study in telecommunication and software industries. International Journal Business Information Systems, 7(1), 78-92. 
30. Singh, A. K., & Sharma, V. (2011b). Knowledge management antecedents and its impact on employee satisfaction: A study on indian telecommunication industries. The Learning Organization, 18(2), 115-130, Emerald Journal, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09696471111103722, Accessed on August 13, 2017.
31. Singh, V. K. (2001). Knowledge Management: A necessity in new Millennium. Delhi Business Review, 2(2), 105-108.
32. Thomas, P. (1996). Introduction: CSCW requirements and evaluation. In P. Thomas (Ed.). CSCW Requirements and Evaluation, pp.1-9. London: Springer.
33. Tomblin, M. S., & Maheshwari, S. K. (2004). Value of knowledge assets: Techniques and problems. Delhi Business Review, 5(1), 33-37.
34. Tseng, S. M. (2008). The effects of information technology on knowledge management systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1), 150-160.