Journal Press India®

Impact of Stressors on Job Satisfaction an Empirical an Alysis

Vol 16 , Issue 2 , July - December 2015 | Pages: 59-68 | Research Paper  

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v16i2.162201519


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Nidhi Dhawan, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Zakir Husain Delhi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India (niddhi_dhawan@yahoo.com)

Global world today comprises of jobs and job conditions that are so strenuous that it is difficult for the employees to manage workplace and carry out other responsibilities easily. The job and environmental conditions are highly demanding and pose uncertainties and challenges for employees due to which stress arises. The purpose of the study is to analyse the factors affecting employees as stressors. Since the role given to an employee in the organisation is what is expected from him; such roles create various role stressors that have been identified in the study that affects the employees working in the public and private sector banks.
Design/Methodology/Approach: For research study, the data has been collected from middle level employees of top two banks selected on the basis of high turnover; public sector (SBI and PNB) and private sector banks (HDFC and ICICI) of Delhi State. A structured questionnaire based on five point Likert scale was used. The secondary data was collected through research publications, standard journals, periodicals, and web. A Stratified sampling method was used for the selection of sectors (public and private sectors) in the banking unit and also for selecting banks in each of these two sectors for the study. A random selection method was used for selecting bank branches from the selected bank organizations (both the sectors) for the study. The sample size for the study comprised of 480 (240 middle level respondents from each sector). The survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. The stressors identified for this research study are role expectation conflict, role erosion and role isolation. For testing research hypothesis, Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) have been used.
Findings: Statistics clearly shows that stress due to role expectation conflict (SRW= 0.77) is the highest. The employees feel contradictory expectations from all the levels (0.73). Role isolation created stress is having a standardised regression weight 0.67 is another stressor affecting employees at workplace resulting due to not enough involvement and collaboration of the employees (SRW=0.87) followed by role erosion. The hypothesis tested showed a significant and negative relationship between the role stressors and overall job satisfaction and a significant and positive relationship between the overall job satisfaction and overall job performance.
 Research Limitations/Implications: The accuracy of the analysis is dependent on the accuracy of the data reported by selected organizations.
 Practical Implications: The results of this study would help banking organisations to better understand the organisational stressors and its impact upon employee’s job satisfaction. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the stress management domain.
 Originality/Value: This study is probably the study in today’s technologically changing environment that systematically determines the antecedents of stress having its impact upon satisfaction in the banking sector in India. It offers a beneficial source of information to banking organisations, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to stress management.

Keywords

Stressors, Job Satisfaction, Role Expectation Conflict, Role Erosion.

  1. Beehr A.T., Jex, M.S., Stacy, A.B., & Murray, A.M. (2000). Work stressors and co-worker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21(4), 391-405.
  2. Buck, V. (1972). Working under pressure, London: Staples Press.
  3. Buunk, B., Jan de Jonge, Jan F. Ybema, & Charles J. de Wolff (1998). Psychological aspects of occupational stress. In Pieter J.D. Drenth, Henk Thierry and Charles J. de Wolff (Eds.) Handbook of Work and Organisational Psychology, (2nd Ed.), UK: Psychological Press Ltd.
  4. Burke, R.J. (1988). Sources of managerial and professional stress in large organization, in Cooper C.L., Payne, R. (Eds.), Causes, Coping and Consequences of Stress at Work. New York & Chichester: John Willey & Sons (pp.77-112).
  5. Caplan, R.D., & Jones, K.W. (1975). Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(6),713-719.
  6. Harrison, R.V. (1976). Job stress as person-environment misfit, presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
  7. House, R.J. & Rizzo, J.R. (1972). Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 7(3), 467-505.
  8. Jamal, M. (2007). Job stress and job performance controversy revisited: An empirical examination in two countries. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 175-187.
  9. Khanna, B.B. (1985). Relationship between organizational climate and organizational role stress and their impact in organizational effectiveness. A case study, PhD thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
  10. Malta, M. (2004). Stress at work, A concept in stress human factors limited, Bus. Psychol. Strategy. Dev., 33(6), 125-133. Miles, R.H. & Perreault, W.D. Jr. (1976). Organizational role conflict: Its antecedents and consequences, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(1), 19-44.
  11. Pareek, U. (1993). Making organizational roles effective. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
  12. Parikh, P., Taukari., & A., Bhattacharya, T. (2004). Occupational stress and coping among nurses, J Health Manage, 6, 115-27.
  13. Pestonjee, D.M. (1992). Stress & coping – The Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Private Limited. Peterson, D. (1995). Organizational behaviour issues for managers, Paper in Indian Institute of Management, Ahmadabad. Robbins, S.P. & Sanghi, S. (2006). Organizational behaviour. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
  14. Singh, A.K. & Dhawan, N. (2013). An empirical analysis of organizational stressors in the banking sector. The Indian Journal of Commerce, 66(3), 255-270.
  15. Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Abstract Views: 0
PDF Views: 313

Advanced Search

News/Events

PCETs Pimpri Chinchw...

PCET's Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering and Research Org...

Institute of Managem...

Institute of Management Technology, Nagpur Organizing International...

GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

IIULM University, Milan, Italy Organizing GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

Dept. of MBA, Karnat...

Department of MBA, KLS, Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi Org...

Indira School of Bus...

Indira School of Mangement Studies PGDM, Pune Organizing Internatio...

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.