India’s Corporate Governance Reforms and Listed Corporations’ Capital Structures

Ms. Kavita Goel; Mr. Ronald McIver

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v16i2.162201515

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Board Members

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

India’s Corporate Governance Reforms and Listed Corporations’ Capital Structures

Kavita Goel, Ronald McIver

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v16i2.162201515

Published Online: November 27, 2015

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Kavita Goel, Lecturer, Australian Institute of Business, Australia (Kavita.Goel@aib.edu.au)

2. Ronald McIver, Lecturer, University of South Australia, Australia

The study aims to examine the impact of reforms of India’s corporate governance standards (via the introduction of and amendments to Clause 49) on the capital structure of its listed corporations.

Design/Methodology/Approach: Simple fixed effects panel regression analysis is utilized on a sample comprised of a balanced panel data set of 275 companies from BSE 500 index of Mumbai Stock Exchange during the 1999 to 2013 period.The study examines the impact of corporate governance reforms on the gearing ratio of firms in India’s listed corporate sector. The impact of stock market development, in terms of increased market capitalization and liquidity after liberalization, and changes in the perceived quality of India’s institutions, are accounted for analysis of this data.

Findings: It concludes that while the initial introduction of reforms to Clause 49 in 2001 reduced average levels of gearing, that the more recent 2006 increase in the scope of Clause 49 has increased its average level. It also finds, consistent with the literature, that stock market development is associated with lower gearing, while improvements in the quality of development of India’s institutions are associated with higher gearing.

Research Limitations/Implications: The study is conducted on companies listed on BSE 500 index and captures data only until 2012-13. Thus, although taken across all sectors the sample of firms is drawn only from larger firms, which may limit generalizability of results/conclusions. Recent amendments to Clause 49 suggest that it may be useful to extend the sample period in future research to check for consistency with this study’s results. Additionally, the recent SEBI proposal for the adoption of a corporate governance model based on the Anglo-Saxon model may show promise. Therefore, scope exists to undertake complementary studies on the impact of the adoption of UK- based concepts such as ‘comply or explain’ on the structure of Indian businesses.

Originality/Value: Addresses a lack of recent studies of the impact of India’s financial liberalization and reforms on financing patterns within its listed corporate sector. Specifically, what has been addressed is the impact of corporate governance reforms, as expressed in Clause 49 of the The Listing Agreement, on corporate financing patterns.

Keywords

India, Stock market development, Debt-Equity Ratio (Gearing), Governance Reform, Clause 49, Capital market, Market capitalization, Liquidity, Listing agreement.

Afsharipour, A. (2009). Corporate governance convergence: Lessons from the Indian experience, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 29(2), 335-402.
American Finance Association, San Francisco, CA, December 28-30, 1983. (Jul., 1984),
Balasubramanian, N., Black, B.S., & Khanna, V. (2008). Firm-Level corporate governance in emerging markets: A case study of India, University of Texas Law School, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 87, March 2008.
Black, B.S. & Khanna, V. (2007). Can corporate governance reforms increase firms’ market values? Evidence from India, University of Texas Law School, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 86.
Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W., & Yadav, P.K. (2008). Corporate governance in India, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(1), 59-72. CMIE: PROWESS Database.
Cobham, D. & Subramanian, R. (1995). Corporate finance in developing countries: New evidence for India, CRIEFF Discussion Paper Series No 9512, University of St. Andrews, Scotland.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (1992). Developing country capital structures and emerging stock markets, World Bank Research Working Paper No. 933.
Demirgrüç-Kunt A. & Levine, R. (1996). Stock market development and financial intermediaries: Stylised facts, World Bank Economic Review, 10(2), 291-321.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A. & Maksimovic, V. (1995). Stock market development and firm financing choices, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1461.
Goel, K. & McIver, R. (2012). Financial liberalisation and corporate capital structure – evidence from India, paper presented at Governance, Competitive Advantages, and Accounting Issues in Emerging Countries, Airlangga Accounting International Conference & Doctoral Colloquium, Nusa Dua, Bali, June 28-29, 2012.
Green, C.J., Murinde V., & Suppakitjarak, J. (2002). Corporate financial structure in India, Economic Research Paper No. 02/4, Centre for International, Financial and Economics Research, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
Maunder, S.K. & Chhibber, P. (1999). Capital structure and performance: Evidence from a transition economy on an aspect of corporate governance, Public Choice, 98(3-4), 287-305.
Misra, D. & Vishnani, S. (2012). Impact of corporate governance regulation on market risk, Vikalpa, 37(2), 19-32.
Myers, S.C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575-592.
Pal, P. (2001). Stock market development and its impact on the financing of the Indian corporate sector, National Stock Exchange (NSE) Research Initiative, National Stock Exchange, Mumbai, Working Paper No. 4, 2001.
Prasad, S., Green, C., & Murinde, V. (2001). Corporate financial structures in developing economies: Evidence from a comparative analysis of Thai and Malay corporations, Finance and Development Research Programme, University of Manchester, Working Paper Series, Paper No. 35.
PRS Group, International Country Risk Guide, Composite Risk Ratings, Researchers’ database, accessed http://unisa.summon.serialssolutions.com/search?s.q=%22researcher%27s+dataset+composite+risk%22, 9 November 2012.
Samual, C. (1996). The stock market as a source of Finance: A comparison of U.S. and Indian Firms, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1592.
Sarkar, J. & Sarkar, S. (2008). Debt and corporate governance in emerging economies: Evidence from India, Economics of Transition, 16(2), 293-334.
Ševiæ, Ž. (2005). Emerging Markets: Preferences, Risks, Performance’, Economic Change and Restructuring, 38(1), 1-10. Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance, Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Tadesse, S. (2004). The allocation and monitoring role of capital markets: Theory and international evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 701-730.
World Stock Exchanges 2014, accessed 25 August 2015, http://www.world-exchanges.org/statistics/annual/2014/equity- markets/domestic-market-capitalization.