Team Effectiveness in Indian Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Public  and  Private Sector

Ms. Neha Verma; Mr. Santosh Rangnekar; Mr. Mukesh Kumar Barua

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v13i2.132201216

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Board Members

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

Team Effectiveness in Indian Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Sector

Neha Verma, Santosh Rangnekar, Mukesh Kumar Barua

Vol 13 , Issue 2 , July - December 2012 | Pages: 43-54 | Research Paper

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v13i2.132201216

Published Online: December 06, 2012

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Neha Verma, Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies (DoMS), Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

2. Santosh Rangnekar, Head & Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies (DoMS), Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

3. Mukesh Kumar Barua, Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies (DoMS), Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

The prime purpose of this study was to find out the difference in team effectiveness (TE) of Indian public and private sector Organizations. It also aimed and explored the differences between TE of small and large teams.

Design/methodology/Approach: Total 88 samples (37 from public sector and 51 from private sector, total 8 teams of different sizes) from Indian Manufacturing Organizations were gathered using TEAM (Team Effectiveness Assessment Measure). Team functioning (TF) and team empowerment (TEm) dimensions were measured on the factors like cohesion, confrontation, collaboration, task clarity, autonomy, support and accountability.

Findings: Visibly, the public sector had higher cohesion, confrontation and TF, while the private sector had higher other factors. But the differences with respect to TE factors and dimensions across sectors and teams of varied sizes were not statistically significant.

Research Limitations/Implications: In spite of limitations like small sample size and survey of few teams from a certain type of manufacturing organizations, this research carries implications for researchers to investigate for the unrevealed facts on TE in Indian contexts.

Practical Implications: Suggestions for better team work have been made on the basis of preliminary scores and observable differences. For instance, public sector executives may increase their TE through enhanced autonomy and the private sector executives may also achieve higher TE through increasing cohesion, as interpreted from the findings.

Originality/Value: The use of specific TE factors/dimensions and the contexts of Indian Manufacturing Organizations make the study a unique contribution towards the dearth of the relevant literature.

Keywords

Team Effectiveness, Team Functioning, Team Empowerment, Cohesion, Collaboration, Autonomy, Support.

Beers, P.J. (2005), “Negotiating Common Ground: Tools for Multidisciplinary Teams”, unpublished doctoral thesis, Open University, Heerlen.
Bhatnagar, D. and Tjosvold, D. (2012), “Leader Values for Constructive Controversy and Team Effectiveness in India”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.109-125.
Cohen, S.G, Ledford Jr., G.E., and Spreitzer, G.M. (1996), “A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness”, Human Relations, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp.643-676.
Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997), “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.239-90.
Cunningham, I., Hyman, J., and Baldry, C. (1996), “Empowerment: The Power to do What?”, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.143-54.
Curseu, P.L. (2006), “Emergent States in Virtual Teams: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.249-61.
Ebert, C. and Neve, P.D. (2001), “Surviving Global Software Development”, IEEE Software, Vol. 18, No. 2 (March/April), pp.62-69.
Erez, A., Lepine, J.A., and Elms, H. (2002), “Effects of Rotated Leadership and Peer Evaluation on the Functioning and Effectiveness of Self-managed Teams: A Quasi-experiment”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp.929-948.
Ganesh, M.P. and Gupta, M. (2006), Study of Virtualness, Task Independence, Extra-role Performance and Team Climate in Indian Software Development Teams, Proceedings of the 20th Australian New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference on Nanagement: Pragmatism, Philosophy, Priorities, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, 6-9 December.
Gondal, A.M. and Khan, A. (2008), “Impact of Team Empowerment on Team Performance: Case of the Telecommunications Industry in Islamabad”, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.138-46.
Gonzalez, M.G., Burke, M.J., Santuzzi, A.M., and Bradley, J.C. (2003), “The Impact of Group Process Variables on the Effectiveness of Distance Collaboration Groups”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.629-48.
Griffin, Abbie (1997), Drivers of NPD Success: The 1997 PDMA Report, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Guzzo, R.A. and Shea, G.P. (1992), “Group Performance and Intergroup Relations in Organizations”, in Dunette, M.D. and Hough, L.M. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Hackman, J.R. (2002), Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
Hogg, M.A. (1992), The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hoover, J. and DiSilvestro, R.P. (2005), The Art of Constructive Confrontation: How to Achieve More Accountability with Less Conflict, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Huckman, R.S., Staats, B.R., and Upton, D.M. (2009), “Team Familiarity, Role Experience, and Performance: Evidence from Indian Software Services”, Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.85-100.
Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., and Gibson, C.B. (2004), “The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-face Interaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.1-17.
Kratzer, J., Leenders, Roger Th. A.J., and Engelen, Jo M.L. Van (2004), “A Delicate Managerial Challenge: How Cooperation and Integration Affect the Performance of NPD Teams”, Team Performance Management. Vol. 10, No. 1/2, pp.20-25.
Mohammed, S. and Dumville. B.C. (2001), “Team Mental Models in a Team Knowledge Framework: Expanding Theory and Measurement Across Disciplinary Boundaries”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.89-106.
Mullen, B. and Copper, C. (1994), “The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 115, No. 2, pp.210-27.
Ozaralli, N. (2003), “Effects of Transformational Leadership on Empowerment and Team Effectiveness”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.335-344.
Pareek, U. (2002), Training Instruments in HRD and OD, 2nd edition, New Delhi, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd.
Price, K.H, Harrison, D.A., and Gavin, J.H. (2006), “Withholding Inputs in Team Contexts: Member Composition, Interaction, Processes, Evaluation Structure, and Social loafing”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp.1375-1384.
Ross, T.M., Jones, E.C., and Adams, S.G. (2008), “Can Team Effectiveness be Predicted?”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 14, No. 5/6, pp.248-268.
Savelsbergh, C.M.J.H., Heijden, B.I.J.M. van der, and Poell, R.F. (2010), “Attitudes Towards Factors Influencing Team Performance: A Multi-rater Approach Aimed at Establishing the Relative Importance of Team Learning behaviors in Comparison with other Predictors of Team Performance”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 16, No. 7/8, pp.451-474.
Sawyer, S. (2001), “Effects of Conflict on Packaged Software Development Team Performance”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.155-78.
Sharma, M. (2007), “Does Team Size Matter?, A Study of the Impact of Team Size on the Transactive Memory System and Performance of IT Sector Teams”, South Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.96-115.
Shrader. C.B., Mulford, C., and Blackburn, V. (1989), “Strategic and Operational Planning, Uncertainty, and Performance in Small Firms”, Journal of Smal1 Business Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.45-60.
Singh, A.K and Antony, D. (2005), “The Spirit of Teamwork: An Empirical Study of Selected Organisation”, Delhi Business Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.1-18.
Singh, N. (2004), Human Resource Management, New Delhi, Galgotia Publications Pvt. Ltd.
Tamilmani, B., Ravichandran, K., Ojha, S., and Kumar, A. (2009), “Evaluation of Team Effectiveness”, Social Science Research Network: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1479171, accessed on September 15, 2010.
Verma, N., Rangnekar, S., and Barua, M. K., (2011), “The Impact of Need Pattern on Team Effectiveness: A Study in Indian Perspective”, in Jha, S., Jha, S. and Malviya, V. (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management, New Delhi, Management Development Research Foundation, Spartacus India, pp.127-141.
Walther, J.B. and Bunz, U. (2005), “The Rules of Virtual Groups: Trust, Liking, and Performance in Computer-mediated Communication”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp.828-46.
Zaccaro, S.J. and Lowe, C.A. (1988), “Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 128, No. 4, pp.547-58.