Continuous and comprehensive evaluation: A study of teachers’ perception

Ms. Pooja Singhal

doi:https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v13i1.131201207

Submit Manuscript Login / Register Subscribe

Home Page

Editorial Board Members

Mission, Aims & Scope

Current Issue

Continuous and comprehensive evaluation: A study of teachers’ perception

Pooja Singhal

Vol 13 , Issue 1 , January - June 2012 | Pages: 81-99 | Research Paper

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v13i1.131201207

Published Online: January 04, 2012

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Pooja Singhal, Research Scholar, Deaprtment of Educational Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi , Delhi, India

School is an institution where talents are nurtured. Therefore it becomes very important to continuously revise and introduce such measures and schemes which will impact the mind, character and physical ability of the learner. Indian education is moving from summative to a continuous evaluation system. This study is an attempt to find out teachers’ perception about the scheme of continuous and comprehensive evaluation, the problems they face while its execution and the suggestions that teachers want to give in making CCE effective and fruitful on ground realities.

Design/Methodology/Approach – The study followed the design of a descriptive survey and consisted a sample of 100 government school teachers from Delhi region.

Findings – The result of the study revealed that currently the perception of government school teachers is average which indicates moderate acceptability of CCE by the teachers. The teachers are not adequately prepared for the effective execution of CCE in government schools. Further the study revealed that the large number of students in the classes, lack of appropriate training, inadequate infrastructure and teaching materials and increased volume of work act as barriers in smooth execution of CCE.

Research Limitations/Implications – This study was an attempt to bring out the ground realities of CCE in government school and thus private schools were not included in the study.

Practical Implications – The results of the study would help the school administration to identify the major problems that the teachers encounter in the classes while executing CCE and take up the appropriate steps in the areas where teachers seek help.

Originality/Value – After the introduction of CCE by CBSE in its affiliated schools, this study was an attempt by the investigator to develop a deep understanding of such burning issue and find out the perception of teachers towards CCE.

Keywords

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation, Evaluation, School Based Evaluation, Examination Reforms.

Agrawal, M. (2005), “Examination Reform Initiatives in India”, Journal of Indian Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp.27-35.
Barsaga, B. (2002), “School-Based Evaluation: A Theoretical Approach”, In school Evaluation on Quality Improvement, pp.94-99, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: ANTRIEP, Retrived May 24, 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/ 001398/139804e.pdf.
Best, W. and Khan, V. (1992), “Research in Education”, Prentice Hall India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Bhattacharjee, A. and Sarma, N. (2009), “Status of Co-Scholastic Activities in the School Programme of the Elementary Schools”, Assam, India, Retrived January 6, 2011 from http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/vol22110/8.pdf
Bhadwal, C.S, Panda, and Kumar P. (1989), “Evaluation at Primary Stage”, The Primary Teacher, pp.13-17.
Burton, Fredrick (1983), America “A Study of the Letter Grade System and Its Effect on the Curriculum”, Retrieved December 19, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/simpleSearch.jsp?newSearch=true&eric_sortField=&searchtype=keyword&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=A+study+of+the+Grade+System+and+Its+Effect+on+the+Curriculum&eric_displayStartCount=1&_pageLabel=ERICSearchResult&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw.
Bursuck, William and Others (1996) “Report Card Grading and Adaptations: A National Survey of Classroom Practices”, Research Report, Retrieved 22 December 2010 from,http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/simpleSearch.jsp;jsessionid=a+RAWVGfFh3LAH9c9svN3g.ericsrv005?newSearch=true&eric_sortField=&searchtype=keyword&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=Report+Card+Grading+and+Adaptations%3A+A+National+Survey+of+Classroom+Practices&eric_displayStartCount=1&_pageLabel=ERICSearchResult&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw.
CBSE (2009), “Teachers’ Manual on Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation”, pp.1-10, Retrived January 4, 2011 from http://cbse.nic.in/cce/cce-manual/initial_pages.pdf.
Khandelwal, B.P (2002), “Examination and Test Systems at School Level in India: Their Impact on Institutional Quality Improvement”, In School Evaluation on Quality Improvement, pp.100-115, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: ANTRIEP. Retrived May 24, 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001398/139804e.pdf.
Kaul, L. (1984), “Methodology of Educational Research”, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
Mangal, S.K. (1992), “Statistics in Psychology and Education”, (Second Reprint), Tata Megraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.
Mead, James V. (1992), Washington D.C) “Teachers’ Evaluations of Student Work”, Research Report, Retrieved December 12, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/recordDetails.jsp?eric_sortField=aau&searchtype=advanced&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_Facet_0=facet_au&ERICExtSearch_SearchCount=1&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=Mead%2C+James+V.+%281992%29&ERICExtSearch_FacetValue_0=%22Mead%2C+James%22&ERICExtSearch_Operator_1=and&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_1=kw&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b8013efa1& accno=ED348357&_nfls=false.
Nava, F.G. and Loyd, B.H. (1992), America “An Investigation of Achievement and Non achievement Criteria in the Elementary and Secondary School Grading”, Retrieved December 13 ,2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/recordDetails.jsp?searchtype=keyword&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_Facet_0=facet_au&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=xiv%29%09Nava%2C+Fe+Josefa+G.+Loyd%2C+Brenda+H.&ERICExtSearch_FacetValue_0=%22Loyd%2C+Brenda%22&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b8013d0a1&accno=ED346145&_nfls=false.
NCERT (2003), “School Based Evaluation: A Scheme Experimented in Primary Classes of D.M. Schools attached to RIEs”, (N.R F23292, Unpublished), New Delhi, India; Rajput S., Tewari A.D & Kumar S.
NCERT, RIE (2004), “Training of the KRPs in Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation with Focus on Grading at the Elementary Stage”, (N.R 923943, Unpublished). Bhubaneswar, India; Padhi J.S.
NCERT (2004), “Evaluation Practices- Across the States”, (N.B F23997, Unpublished), New Delhi, India, Kumar S., Gautam S.K.S., Pandit B.L., and Shekhar Chandra K.
NCERT (2004), “Training in Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (ClassVI-VIII) for the Key Resource persons of Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Chandigarh”, (NAT F23745, Unpublished), Ajmer, India; Pandey M.M.
Naidoo, P. J. (2002). “A Review of School Evaluation Mechanisms in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, the Phillipines and Malaysia”, In School Evaluation on Quality Improvement, pp.41-70, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: ANTRIEP. Retrived May 24, 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001398/139804e.pdf.
Prakash, V. and Bhalla, M.K. (1996), “Examination Reforms: Impediments and Breakthrough”, Educational News, Vol. 21. No. 4, pp.14-21.
Ramdas, V. and Divya, T. (2007), “Grading in Schools: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Elementary Teachers”, Edutracks, Hyderabad, Vol. 6. No. 11 (July), pp.17-21.
Rao, P.M (2006), “Impact of Training in Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation on the Evaluation Practices of Teachers of Primary Schools in Tamil Nadu”, Indian Educational Review, Vol. 42. No. 1 (January 10), pp.60-78.
Rao, M.P. and Rao, P. (2004), Mysore, India “Effectiveness of Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation Over the Evaluation Practices of Teachers”, Retrieved December 21,2010, from http://conference.nie.edu.sg/paper/Converted%20Pdf/ ab00673.pdf.
Robinson, G.E. and Craver, J. (1989), Arlington “Assessing and Grading Student Achievement.ERS Report”, Retrieved January 03, 2011, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/recordDetails.jsp?searchtype=keyword&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_Facet_0=facet_au&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ERS+Report&ERICExtSearch_FacetValue_0=%22Robinson%2C+Glen%22&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b8010ac15&accno=ED305748&_nfls=false.
Sharma, R.A. (2006), “Advanced Statistics in Education and Psychology”, Surya Publication, New Delhi.
Shaffi, S.A. (2002), “National Curriculum Framework- A Holistic View”, Journal of Indian Education, Vol. 28. No. 1, pp.1-9.
Singh, A. (2010), Grading System for schools, Journal of Indian Education. pp.105-111
Stiggins, Richard J. and Others (1986), Washington, DC, “Inside High School Grading Practices, The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Program Report”, Retrived January 12,2011 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/ recordDetails.jsp?searchtype=advanced&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_SearchCount=1&ERICExtSearch_Facet_0=facet_au&ERICExtSearch_FacetValue_0=%22Stiggins%2C+Richard%22&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=Stiggins%2C+Richard+J.&eric_displayStartCount=21&ERICExtSearch_Operator_1=and&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_1=kw&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b80126511&accno=EJ398476&_nfls=false.