Journal Press India®

Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions of India: A Cross-sectional Study

https://doi.org/10.51768/dbr.v11i2.112201015

Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Pankaj K. Agarwal, Research Fellow, XLRI, Johnpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2. S.K. Sinha, Head, Department of Financial Studies, VBS Purvanchal University, Johnpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

For a country like India, poverty remains to be one of the biggest policy concerns. Amongst various measures to eradicate it, Microfinance, of late, has provided a ray of hope.  The Task Force on Supportive Policy and Regulatory Framework for Microfinance constituted by NABARD defined microfinance as “the provision of thrift, saving, credit and financial services and products of very  small amount to the poor  in rural, semi-urban and urban areas for enabling them to raise their income levels and improve their standard of living” (Sen,  2008).
In numerous studies done across the world, it is generally believed that various microfinance initiatives have been able to make a difference in the target population’s lives. However, increasing doubts have been raised over the financial sustainability of microfinance institutions. MFIs  need  to be economically viable and  sustainable in  the  long  run  but  economic implications of  long  term sustainability are not being considered (Srinivasan et al., 2006).
At least in India, there does not seem to be any working model of analyzing the financial performance and thereby sustainability of microfinance institutions. This problem is compounded by the absence of a dedicated legislation on working and management of microfinance institutions. The lack of a regulatory mechanism for financial disclosures by microfinance institutions also abets the problem.
The present study is an attempt to analyze the financial performance of various microfinance institutions operating in India. It assumes significance because it is imperative that these institutions be run efficiently given the fact that they are users of marginal and scarce capital and the intended beneficiaries are the marginalized sections of society. MFIs must be able to sustain themselves financially in order to continue pursuing their lofty objectives, through good financial performance.

Keywords

Microfinance, Financial Sustainability

  1. Arsyad, Lincolin (2005), An Assessment of Microfinance Institution Performance: The Importance of Institutional Environment, Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2005, Vol. 7, No.3, pp.391-427.
  2. Chaves, R.A., and C. Gonzales-Vega (1996), The Design of Successful Rural Financial Intermediaries: Evidence from Indonesia, World Development, Vol.24, No.1, pp.65-78.
  3. Crabb, Peter (2008), “Economic Freedom and Success of Microfinance Institutions”, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.205-219.
  4. Dayson, Karl and Quach, Hao (2006), Toward a Performance Assessment of Microfinance Institutions in Europe, Finance and The Common Good, No. 25, autumn 2006.
  5. Ledgerwood, J. (1999), Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective, Washington, DC: World Bank. Meyer, R.L. (2002), “Track Record of Financial Institutions in Assisting the Poor in Asia”, ADB Institute Research Paper, No. 49, December 2002.
  6. Morduch, J. (1999), The Microfinance Promise, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp.1569-1614. 
  7. Robinson, M.S. (2001), The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  8. Sen, Mitali (2008), “Assessing Social Performance of Microfinance Institutions in India”, The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. 14, No. 86, pp.77-86.
  9. Srinivasan R. and Sriram, M.S. (2006), Microfinance in India: Discussion, IIMB Management Review, pp.66-86. World Bank (2000), World Development Report 2000/2001, Washington DC. The World Bank. www.mixmarket.org
  10. Yaron, Y. (1992), Successful Rural Finance Institutions, World Bank Discussion Papers, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  11. Yaron, Y. (1994), What Makes Rural Finance Institutions Successful?, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 9, No.1, pp.49-70.
  12. Yaron, Y., Mc.D. Benjamin, and G. Piprek (1997), Rural Finance: Issues, Design, and Best Practice, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Studies and Monograph Series 14, Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
  13. Yaron, Y., Mc. D.Benjamin, and S Charitonenko (1998), Promoting Efficient Rural Financial Intermediation, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.147-170.
  14. Zeller, Manfred and Meyers, Richard (2003), The Triangle of Microfinance: Financial Sustainability, Outreach and impact, John Hopkins university Press, Baltimo
Abstract Views: 4
PDF Views: 0

Advanced Search

News/Events

PCETs Pimpri Chinchw...

PCET's Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering and Research Org...

Institute of Managem...

Institute of Management Technology, Nagpur Organizing International...

GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

IIULM University, Milan, Italy Organizing GENDER CULTURES: Mul...

Dept. of MBA, Karnat...

Department of MBA, KLS, Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi Org...

Indira School of Bus...

Indira School of Mangement Studies PGDM, Pune Organizing Internatio...

Indira Institute of ...

Indira Institute of Management, Pune Organizing International Confe...

D. Y. Patil Internat...

D. Y. Patil International University, Akurdi-Pune Organizing Nation...

ISBM College of Engi...

ISBM College of Engineering, Pune Organizing International Conferen...

Periyar Maniammai In...

Department of Commerce Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science &...

Institute of Managem...

Vivekanand Education Society's Institute of Management Studies ...

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.