Journal Press India®

Social Media and Crowd-sourced Opinions: Challenges & Future

Vol 2 , Issue 1 , January - June 2022 | Pages: 33-38 | Research Paper  

https://doi.org/10.17492/computology.v2i1.2205


Author Details ( * ) denotes Corresponding author

1. * Rohini A., Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology and Sciences, Vishakapatnam, India (rohinaruna@gmail.com)
2. Tanupriya Choudhury, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India (tanupriya.choudhury@sitpune.edu.in)

The utilization of crowd-sourced opinions by policy makers presents a difficult task in terms of managing information and ensuring authenticity. Information retrieval and handling extensive link-intensive applications across widely distributed in the social network. Social media facilitates the information diffusion to the community and supporting online community development. In order to establish a transparent decision-making process, strategies are effectively filter the insights derived from the crowd-sourced opinions It is a significant challenge within the realm of social networks; therefore, policy makers must ensure that they avoid being influenced by biased sources when making decisions. The detection of communities can be achieved through link prediction algorithms, which can also aid in understanding how information propagates within social network structures. Ego-centric nodes play an essential role in disseminating information and serve as an efficient method for selecting a opinion of nodes within the network.

Keywords

Social Media, Crowdsourcing, Recommender Systems, Decision Making, Link Prediction algorithm


  1. T Ilić-Kosanović, V. T. (2020). The students' expectations from higher education career development centres' courses: Case of the School of engineering management. Serbian Journal of Engineering Management, 5(1):68-74, DOI:10.5937/SJEM2001068I

  2. Tyler Derr, Z. W. (2020). Link and interaction polarity predictions in signed networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 10(1) DOI:10.1007/s13278-020-0630-6

  3. UmitCan, B. (2019). Online social network analysis problems and applications. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 535(6):122372 , DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2019.122372

  4. Wajid Rafiquea, M. K. (2019). SocioRank*: A community and role detection method in social networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 122-132.

  5. Wang, Z. (2020). Propagation history ranking in social networks: A causality-based approach. IEEE. 25(2):161-179 ,DOI:10.26599/TST.2018.9010126

  6. Wei Kuang Lai, Y. U.-Y. (2020). Analysis and evaluation of random-based message propagation models on social networks. Computer Networks, V(170), 107047

  7. Wit, R. U. (2020). Test for triadic closure and triadic protection in temporal relational event data. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 10(1), DOI:10.1007/s13278-020-0632-4

  8. Woods, J. (2019). Network Centrality and Open Innovation: A Social Network Analysis of an SME Manufacturing Cluster. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, PP(99):1-14, DOI:10.1109/TEM.2019.2934765

  9. Xiangnan Kong, P. S. (2018). Graph Classification in Heterogeneous Networks. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_176

  10. Xinhua Wang, X. Y. (2019). Exploiting Social Review-Enhanced Convolutional Matrix Factorization for Social Recommendation. ieee, PP(99):1-DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924443

  11. Yang, L.-X. (2020). Simultaneous Benefit Maximization of Conflicting Opinions: Modeling and Analysis. IEEE Systems Journal, PP(99):1-12, DOI:10.1109/JSYST.2020.2964004




  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
Abstract Views: 85
PDF Views: 135

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.